Shevek (shevek) wrote,

I recently posted a rant about the lack of skills in the workplace. My main thesis was that technical people live in a comfort zone, and are often unwilling to better themselves in the interests of differentiation while such betterment is not absolutely required by the position. My side-thesis was that there is no point advertising publicly for a good person to fill a position because good people would "become known". As a consequence of my posting the rant, such a good person has made himself known to me, and so I am now happy.

I am reminded of an episode written by Le Guin in which a teacher refused to examine the class. The class protested, "In which case how will we know who are the good students and who the bad?" The teacher replied, "Surely you already know who are the good students."

On the whole, I think we know who the good programmers are, the trick is generally finding people who are both good and available for hire, and who haven't succumbed to the lure of insultancy. So I should clarify: What was made known to me was not that this person was good - I knew that already - but that he is interested, which I did not.

In other news, my name is on a patent application. I've not been much involved in the paperwork to date; I'm sure that I will have to do a thorough review at some point and wrap my head around the torturous language employed nowadays.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.